It was confirmed in Insider #89, in the Underworld article.

Actually, that's why I asked Leland about the whole Dooku birthdate. That's what's going to determine it. I figure on finding out, then filling it in that thread where you first asked.

See I KNEW I wasn't the only one concerned about this

Thanks Nathan

Actually, let me sort of revise my question about Dooku here . . .

We were told that Dooku was born 103 BBY. That would make him 83 in Yoda: Dark Rendezvous, as that book states.

Now, the dates in Legacy of the Jedi work perfectly consistently with that, if the Qui-Gon/Obi-Wan segment of that story takes place in the year 45 BBY. However, it refers to the events of "The Day of Reckoning" in the past tense.

So, I guess a better question would be: Could you please let us know in what years the Jedi Apprentice stories actually take place?

As best as I'd been able to figure, based on when stories are contiguous or not, and based on references to Obi-Wan's ages in the stories, I figured as follows:

45 BBY: The Rising Force and The Dark Rival

44 BBY: The Hidden Past - The Day of Reckoning (with Legacy of the Jedi's Qui-Gon/Obi-Wan segment shortly after TDOR)

43 BBY: The Fight for Truth and The Shattered Peace

42 BBY: The Deadly Hunter, The Evil Experiment, and The Dangerous Rescue

41 BBY: The Qui-Gon/Obi-Wan segment of Deceptions, then The Ties That Bind on through The Only Witness

40 BBY: The Threat Within

39 BBY: Secrets of the Jedi (ch 1 - 20) and The Followers (ch 1 - 12)

Can you set me straight on all these dates? It seems a long, drawn out scenario, but the age references tend to get things thrown off often.

Actually, that's why I asked Leland about the whole Dooku birthdate. That's what's going to determine it. I figure on finding out, then filling it in that thread where you first asked.

To add a tad into my previous question just now, I would also ask if we should assume that most of the dates in A Tangled Web are rounding. I mean, Ferus is said to not have seen Bog for 10 years . . . which is a pretty extreme rounding, since the event he's referring to happened only 6 years earlier or so.

I know this has probably been asked a bunch of times but can someone please provide a definitive answer to which is the true Battle of Coruscant, clone wars or Labyrinth of Evil.
I thought it was LOE, based on the Revenge novel referencing it but when i was flipping through the new essential chronology it was recounting the clone wars version.

So which one was in the holocron???

"Is this evidence that the light side playing o####OTOR' is canon?"

I thought it was canon now that Reven was light-side male and Exile was light-side (?) female?

At least there was a bit of a kerfluffle about it over at the TFN boards when I skimmed them last week. I think the New Chronology book set this up.

Forgive me if this has been covered...

In 'KOTOR' you can only use the Qel-Droma robes if you're playing the light side.
In 'Tales' Duron Qel-Droma says that Revan will use his robes.

Is this evidence that the light side playing of 'KOTOR' is canon?
Or is it simply Duron seeing a possible future?

I'm just curious what the usual procedure is in these circumstances.
Licensees provide a name for approval or they ask LFL to provide a name. Sometimes things are shown at events such as these prior to submission to LFL for final approval.

Sometimes the Star Wars Galaxies website features player-created characters, ships, and events. Obviously anything player-created is normally non-canon - but usually the website is treated as canon. So what's the deal here? I'm assuming still non-canon.
Non-continuity since they exist only in a single galaxy/server.

You're right of course. I'm wondering, doesn't LFL decide what name they will have? It seems that Hasbro has already named this droid, can't LFL change his name if they would like to? Who gave Hasbro the permission to use that name? I'm just curious what the usual procedure is in these circumstances.