Home » StarWars Forums » Beyond The Movies » The Expanded Universe


Thread: Holocron continuity database questions



Permlink Replies: 2,982 - Pages: 150 [ Previous | 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 150 | Next ] - Last Post: Apr 25, 2011 1:41 PM Last Post By: Leland Y Chee
Lord Darth Deva...

Posts: 27
Registered: 07/26/08
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 30, 2008 4:13 AM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Hmmm... interesting conversation. I refind hope about the future of the continuity of the saga :). But : back to the future :P :

It is said in the German Version of The Star Wars Official Fact Files that Executor Sedriss was originally named Qaga Lok, that he was a descendant of Ulic Qel-Droma, who renamed himself Sedriss QL ( therefore Sedriss would be a Sith name...) in honor of the Darth title ( which he replaced by the Imperial title of Executor )...
Actually, with the unpublished Lightsider novel, Sedriss's origines are a mystery... So : are these informations official or unofficial, please ?
Sithar1

Posts: 215
Registered: 06/07/08
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 30, 2008 2:22 AM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Nathan -- I really appreciate you taking the time to write all that and defend Mr. Chee; I totally agree with you. Although there have been a lot of materials that will be contradictory for the new clone wars releases, the fact remains that George Lucas created ALL of this. Had he not created SW, we would not be talking here. We would not have all of the great novels and stories that we can enjoy now. Its GL's call, and if he wants to rearrange some timeline points, that's his right. I read the new KT novelization and found absolutely no problem with it. Still a GREAT story and GREAT writing. Let's just be happy with what we've got instead of going crazy thinking of how they're going to revamp a timeline. Leland--- I greatly appreciate all you are doing, and wish you the best of luck with reworking the timline.
Leland Y Chee


Posts: 1,450
Registered: 05/05/00
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 30, 2008 1:25 AM   in response to: Nathan P. Butler in response to: Nathan P. Butler
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Holy smokes, Nathan. I appreciate your faith and support and couldn't have said it all better myself. With that said, the one part that I can't make any promises on is "that solution that is in the works is coming soon." Here's something I posted on the Dark Horse boards:

I wonder if LFL's going to provide a revamped timeline at some point.
At some point I'm sure we'll do a revamped timeline, but not any time soon. We need to wait until an end to the series is in sight.
Nathan P. Butler


Posts: 4,653
Registered: 10/11/01
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 6:59 PM   in response to: hero_of_the_emp... in response to: hero_of_the_emp...
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Well, you did have a good point. It probably would be easier to just retcon the dates of the new Clone Wars film/tv stories rather than the previous material. I just mean to break down the discussion for a little more clarity and, to be honest, a bit more fairness toward Leland. :)
hero_of_the_emp...


Posts: 24
Registered: 04/20/08
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 5:42 PM   in response to: Nathan P. Butler in response to: Nathan P. Butler
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
You're absolutely right, in everything you said.

Just disregard the majority of my last post, then.
Nathan P. Butler


Posts: 4,653
Registered: 10/11/01
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 5:23 PM   in response to: Nathan P. Butler in response to: Nathan P. Butler
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
4. The compression idea is actually NOT as bad as it sounds. I've taken the time to look through my own SWT-G for the years between AOTC and ROTS. We need to keep in mind a few things:

A. A lot of these stories do not involve Anakin and Obi-Wan. There's a huge number of stories that focus upon either clone forces, other Jedi, or the saga of Quinlan Vos.

B. In MOST of the stories, time frames are not extremely important. Often, we are given dates in various comics and such that are not so much important in and of themselves, but simply there because it lets us know when certain stories take place relative to each other. If Secret of the Jedi is 29 months after AOTC, and Jedi Trial is 30 months after AOTC, is that month between important? Not really. Is that number of months after AOTC that important? Not really. Is the fact that Jedi Trial comes shortly after Secrets of the Jedi important? Absolutely. Compressing is different from rearranging. Compressing the material we have seen would keep it solid, just make it a shorter time span.

C. For those who think compressing is a bad idea because we can't fit that many stories into a few months, I would point you to the INSANE amount of materials that exist between ANH and the evacuation of Yavin IV about 6 months later, and the overall INSANE amount of materials that exist between ANH and ESB, some of which is still being printed to this day (Rebellion, for example). Compressed, chock-full time periods are nothing new to SW.

D. Most of the birth dates and such that would be tweaked by this change are not major issues. For example, Hero of Cartao tells us that Jafer Torles is born 94 BBY. Uhm . . . okay. What would it matter if that were changed? Most of these "random" events that we can trace back to the Clone Wars materials are somewhat self-contained references, and there simply has not been enough materials released since the Clone Wars publishing venture that rely on the Clone Wars dates (except perhaps, say, In the Shadow of Their Fathers) to have it really matter. It's a lot of work changing things for a fandom timeline creator like me, but it's not the end of the world, and the events would still retain their integrity regardless.

5. We cannot expect the timing choices of Lucas for the film and series to be shuffled around for the purposes of the EU. As much as that might make things easier, rather than compressing several years of other publishing materials, remember that it is Lucas' sandbox. He gets to make that call.

So . . . it might be a pain in the butt to rearrange and update things like the SWT-G or Wookieepedia, but that's the nature of this sort of thing. Roll with the punches, keep enjoying the materials. Apparently there is a solution in the works, that solution that is in the works is coming soon, presumably, so we will come to understand how things have been compressed. That's a lot more than we had been told for the last several months of people asking about it, so that's a big step in the right direction.
Nathan P. Butler


Posts: 4,653
Registered: 10/11/01
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 5:05 PM   in response to: hero_of_the_emp... in response to: hero_of_the_emp...
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Sounds like a lot of the same angst that I've been feeling is bubbling up again, but let's try to keep this in perspective, folks.

This is me saying this. Many of you know me, or the online SW community "me," at least. With 1500+ pages of the Star Wars Timeline Gold and nearly 11 years of the Star Wars Timeline Project under my belt, I'm about as continuity minded as they come, but I also attempt to approach things with some intellectual honesty.

If we are being intellectually honest, then we have to recognize a few things:

1. Dark Horse, Del Rey, etc. could not have known how the Clone Wars era would be tweaked by this new film and TV series when they were publishing the Clone Wars materials circa 2002 - 2005. Fans of the film and TV series should not turn their ire there.

2. By the same token, we, as fans, and the EU creators (Dark Horse, Del Rey, etc.) have always known, if being intellectually honest, that there is George Lucas' vision of SW, and there is the Expanded Universe, and those are not always in line with each other. The EU has been influenced by Lucas, and he has, at times, been influenced by the EU, but it is Lucas' sandbox. When he tweaked some ideas with TPM, they were tweaked in the EU. Then AOTC and ROTS did the same, and they were tweaked. That's how it is, and the moment we heard of new Lucas-driven projects, we knew that some retconning would be necessary. This is no surprise, and Lucas cannot be blamed for exercising his creative rights over the saga he created.

3. Leland Chee here has been perhaps the greatest boon to fans of continuity in all 30+ years of Star Wars continuity publications. He juggles things an impossible amount of information to do what is, in all honesty, an impossible task: to keep it all straight and make it all fit. He does, however, do this job with aplomb, taking the time to speak with fans, and seems to truly love the saga, as we do. As such, no one could have a 100% success rate, but he certainly gains higher marks than most others in his position would be able to garner. We should be, frankly, thanking him for his efforts, rather than venting our frustrations over this current bizarre situation in his direction. He's right there with us trying to make sense of it. In fact, he's far more in the thick of it than we are.

(continues in next post so as not to write a novel in one post...)
hero_of_the_emp...


Posts: 24
Registered: 04/20/08
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 3:57 PM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Tasty, with all due respect, is reworking the timeline really a good idea? I mean, sure, some issues can be easily fixed with a retcon or two, but we're talking about years being compressed into months. I have faith that all will work out in the end, but I find myself asking, is it really worth it? I realize I'm new to the forums, and I don't want to sound like a know-it-all only to be kicked out. But I think it'd be a lot easier to simply retcon the events in The Clone Wars books, movie, and TV series as occuring later on, rather than enacting a major overhaul of the Clone Wars timeline and subsequent events.

And while we're on the subject, after everything's all said and done, will the Clone Wars still have taken place in the timeframe of 22 BBY-19 BBY, or is an additional year or two being added in there?

Again, I apologize if I sounded rude, but I feel that this could all be a lot simpler.
Nathan P. Butler


Posts: 4,653
Registered: 10/11/01
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 3:16 PM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I'm not sure if that's the answer I was hoping for, but I'm glad to hear an official take on it all. Thank you very much, my good man. :)
Leland Y Chee


Posts: 1,450
Registered: 05/05/00
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 12:59 PM   in response to: Kli Darth Paulus in response to: Kli Darth Paulus
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Compressing the whole timeline will throw just about every source since Episode II out of line, surely. And that'll cause continuity errors everywhere, from the major and obvious ones, to smaller ones like births, marriages and deaths.
Trust me, it's not a decision we're taking lightly. And at some point, we'll rework the official timeline so you can see how everything fits. But until the latter portions of the series become more solidified, we won't publish anything official.

*Um, Tasty, and what is that "minimal retconning" supposed to be? I DO hope it doesn't mean that every novel and comic that includes Anakin, Obi-Wan and some time reference will be moved to N-canon... *
Everything's staying C-canon. As we've always done, any specific inconsistencies will be dealt with case-by-case as needed.
Kli Darth Paulus

Posts: 47
Registered: 11/02/02
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 10:42 AM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Um, Tasty, and what is that "minimal retconning" supposed to be? I DO hope it doesn't mean that every novel and comic that includes Anakin, Obi-Wan and some time reference will be moved to N-canon...
the fragrant wo...


Posts: 1,256
Registered: 05/14/00
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 10:04 AM   in response to: the fragrant wo... in response to: the fragrant wo...
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
  • It just occurred to me that I should probably make it clear that I was joking about the assassination thing; I know there are some mental fans out there. I'm just a frustrated and disappointed one. *
the fragrant wo...


Posts: 1,256
Registered: 05/14/00
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 10:00 AM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Compressing the timeline is our approach

You don't think that that's a bit... well... ridiculous?

Compressing the whole timeline will throw just about every source since Episode II out of line, surely. And that'll cause continuity errors everywhere, from the major and obvious ones, to smaller ones like births, marriages and deaths.
Sorry, Leland, I know it's not your fault... and I don't envy the work you've got ahead of you trying to make it all cohesive.

I always swore that I'd only assassinate GL if he made Episodes 7, 8 and 9, ruining the post-RotJ EU, but now....
Leland Y Chee


Posts: 1,450
Registered: 05/05/00
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 9:52 AM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Surely this has been considered and worked out already.

I'll start with Dave Filoni's quote from Comic-Con: "Every now and then you run into a Boba Fett scenario, where we didn't know he was a clone, and the Jaster Mereel, and now he's not, and now he's a clone. And then we call Leland Chee and it's his problem."

Since early in the development of the series, Licensing has worked with Animation in targeting any potential continuity discrepencies with existing Clone Wars EU and so far, any seemingly major issues have been dealt with by using what I see as minimal retconning.

Throughout the history of the EU, our authors have overcome numerous seemingly unsurmountable discrepencies with ingenious explanations. Jan Dodonna dead? No he was an Imperial prisoner. Hobbie and Jansen dead? Hobbie just crashes alot but manages to survive and Jansen? That's just a story he and Wedge like to tell. Stormtroopers are clones? Well, not all of them. Jedi can't marry? Well this is the new Jedi Order or that was the ancient Jedi Order or Ki-Adi-Mundi's species has special circumstances. And Jaster Mereel? That's actually part of Jango's backstory.

And to paraphrase from my comments at The Clone Wars books panel at Comic-Con, Star Wars continuity doesn't reboot.
Leland Y Chee


Posts: 1,450
Registered: 05/05/00
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 29, 2008 9:09 AM   in response to: Nathan P. Butler in response to: Nathan P. Butler
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Or, barring that, will we be seeing everything before when Anakin became a knight somehow compressed into a matter of a few months, rather than 2.5 years?
Compressing the timeline is our approach, though I'm not expecting a revised official timeline to be published any time soon.
Nathan P. Butler


Posts: 4,653
Registered: 10/11/01
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 26, 2008 10:17 PM   in response to: Lord Darth Deva... in response to: Lord Darth Deva...
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
So . . . having now read The Clone Wars (both Traviss' and West's versions), it seems like, despite references to Anakin as twenty and "months" having passed since the forbidden wedding, these stories would fit in very easily in that six-month gap between Jedi Trial / Dreadnaughts of Rendili / Dark Rendezvous and Siege at Saleucami / Labyrinth of Evil / Clone Wars Micro-Series.

The only sticking point would be the appearance of Ventress, since she'll be gone by the time of Obsession, but push Obsession back just a bit, and you can slide The Clone Wars, it seems, right on in there (barring some Anakin haircut issues, but even the scar would be there correctly).

Is there any chance/hope that this barely-filled era will be when the series is finally worked into continuity?

Or, barring that, will we be seeing everything before when Anakin became a knight somehow compressed into a matter of a few months, rather than 2.5 years?

Or, worse, is there any possibility at this point that we continuity buffs should be preparing for the worst: a huge chunk of Clone Wars novel/comic continuity being flat-out chopped out of continuity altogether?

I know this has been asked before, plenty, mostly during the long absence of most of the VIPs from the boards. Now that the Clone Wars novelization and other products are out, I do think it's the right time to finally start getting some concrete information on this before some of us go batty. ;)

Surely this has been considered and worked out already. This can't be something that's a surprise behind the scenes at this point. :)
Lord Darth Deva...

Posts: 27
Registered: 07/26/08
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 26, 2008 5:35 AM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
It is said in the German Version of The Star Wars Official Fact Files that Executor Sedriss was originally named Qaga Lok, that he was a descendant of Ulic Qel-Droma, who renamed himself Sedriss QL ( therefore Sedriss would be a Sith name...) in honor of the Darth title ( which he replaced by the Imperial title of Executor )...
Actually, with the unpublished Lightsider novel, Sedriss's origines are a mystery... So : are these informations official or unofficial, please ?
IG_88D

Posts: 5
Registered: 07/04/08
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 24, 2008 4:47 PM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Hey, what exactly is the IG-88 in Renegade Squadron? I'd think all of the models except A were destroyed by the time the distraction on Sullust happened.
IG_88D

Posts: 5
Registered: 07/04/08
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 24, 2008 4:47 PM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Hey, what exactly is the IG-88 in Renegade Squadron? I'd think all of the models except A were destroyed by the time the distraction on Sullust happened.
Maphisto86

Posts: 4
Registered: 01/20/06
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Jul 18, 2008 10:45 AM   in response to: Maphisto86 in response to: Maphisto86
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Question 3 Reply: I figured as much... I just always wondered if George Lucas and the Canon supported what the fans already surmised. There is much about the Force (especially the dark side) that has not been explained. It seems in the upcoming Clone Wars feature we do see Dooku/Darth Tyranus with those eyes. The Force is said to bind the galaxy together in the films... so it makes sense that it's use (or abuse) would affect the physical body as well.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums