Home » StarWars Forums » Beyond The Movies » The Expanded Universe


Thread: Holocron continuity database questions



Permlink Replies: 2,982 - Pages: 150 [ Previous | 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 150 | Next ] - Last Post: Apr 25, 2011 1:41 PM Last Post By: Leland Y Chee
mason_1701


Posts: 949
Registered: 11/12/06
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 6:11 PM   in response to: Nathan P. Butler in response to: Nathan P. Butler
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
My only question is:

Is this continuity change really any worse than "Boba Fett hunting Princess Leia during the Clone Wars" changing into "A clone of Jango Fett, impersonating his legitimate son (in place of child-Boba), hunting Padme (in place of unborn-Leia)"?


"Support Hutt-on-Hutt Love."


"Support Hutt-on-Hutt Love."

Edited by: mason_1701 on Mar 12, 2011 9:14 PM
Nathan P. Butler


Posts: 4,653
Registered: 10/11/01
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 3:16 PM   in response to: IllogicalRogue2 in response to: IllogicalRogue2
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
IllogicalRogue2 wrote:
Oh and I'm sure Nathan knows- I'm just talking in General- I'm not saying anything Nathan doesn't know better then I ;) Just thinking as I go.

I think it just depends on the perception we have of the situation. If we consider it as one big continuity with elements being deemed "real or not," then it is one continuity. If every minor tweak is viewed as creating a separate "alternate universe," then it is dozens upon dozens of continuities (or more).

I think the LFL vision is the former, but if you are talking "temporal mechanics" in the scientific and sci-fi approaches to the term, then it is easy to see it as the latter.

I'll save you the overused Obi-Wan quote. ;)
IllogicalRogue2


Posts: 11,443
Registered: 02/04/03
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 2:19 PM   in response to: IllogicalRogue2 in response to: IllogicalRogue2
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Oh and I'm sure Nathan knows- I'm just talking in General- I'm not saying anything Nathan doesn't know better then I ;) Just thinking as I go.
IllogicalRogue2


Posts: 11,443
Registered: 02/04/03
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 2:15 PM   in response to: Nathan P. Butler in response to: Nathan P. Butler
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Nathan P. Butler wrote:
However, for such a gigantic franchise and storytelling effort, Star Wars does a better job than most in keeping things straight.

Oh I agree 100%

And I think this is where most people make the misconception that it's kept one and only one. I think the fact that Trek books for so long rebooted at the end of each book also played into that.

If we assume that inconsistencies will grow more numerous or more egregious, the larger a franchise gets, and we take that into account when comparing to other, smaller franchises, Star Wars has done a bang-up job of keeping things straight. It isn't perfect, but for its size, it isn't nearly the nightmare of many other franchises that either tried and failed to create something this cohesive (e.g. Highlander) or just flat-out gave up (e.g. Robotech).

And again I agree with you Nathan, but as it's grown it's continued issues due to someone's ever changing vision have almost made it where every book out there has an issue with it's continuity. Or will. And due to THAT we can't really say it's all part of one story in that "one universe" sense. Cause what happens to the parts that get bumped isn't that they "go away" they are dropped a canon level or two. So they existed for "another Luke" or who ever the story was about. As with Piell- until they retcon him out of CN for good he has to exist there in a lower canon level now now in a new alternate universe where the event happened as stated, but he now dies in the prime universe (G-level - which we heard from Leland as confirmation of the events from T-level events seen by us on the show.) Imagine if Leland's statement read: "George decided to make TCW an in-universe miniseries so existing EU books and comics could continue without fear of elements lost." or "George has declared his changes from here on out only effect books with the EU2 emblem on them- all other books exist separately from G-level with no need to retcon to fit to current G-level materials"

In many regards we watch T-level TCW and await Leland to tell us what's the official G-level stance on the episodes elements.

Like Sing's not using the Force in TCW yet her backstorys with her using it still work cause they are just not mentioning her having it and for the shows intents and purposes she's not one.

But yes it could be a lot worse. But then I feel every day it gets a little worse by the tiniest of degrees- but even a single degree off a bullet will miss it's target in the long run if the target's far off in the distance.

And I ponder way too much as usual - it's my joy in life to ponder I guess. lol
Nathan P. Butler


Posts: 4,653
Registered: 10/11/01
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 1:31 PM   in response to: IllogicalRogue2 in response to: IllogicalRogue2
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Yes, and no.

The intent is to make it one seamless continuity, but various factors cause there to be inconsistencies, big and small, from time to time.

However, for such a gigantic franchise and storytelling effort, Star Wars does a better job than most in keeping things straight. If we assume that inconsistencies will grow more numerous or more egregious, the larger a franchise gets, and we take that into account when comparing to other, smaller franchises, Star Wars has done a bang-up job of keeping things straight. It isn't perfect, but for its size, it isn't nearly the nightmare of many other franchises that either tried and failed to create something this cohesive (e.g. Highlander) or just flat-out gave up (e.g. Robotech).
IllogicalRogue2


Posts: 11,443
Registered: 02/04/03
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 1:21 PM   in response to: Darth_Trayus1 in response to: Darth_Trayus1
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Darth_Trayus1 wrote:
Actually, don't do that. The whole reason I - and a LOT of others - enjoy the Star Wars Expanded Universe is because it's all part of the same story. It truly is modern myth, and if it were broken up into little independent stories, it will never have the same lasting, resonating purpose. Is it a headache sometimes? Sure, but it's a headache that I'm willing to put up with.

If the continuity were no longer meaningful, I would have no reason to continue indulging in it.


That's the REAL MYTH though.

Go back in SW- it's never lined up. It's never been one same story. It's been retconing itself from the beginning. Star Wars oh wait no it was Star Wars: A New Hope.

We had Canon levels created to give us an ILLUSION of one continuity but the reality was each canon level acts like it's own universe, it's own mini continuity.
YodaBauer2442


Posts: 2,543
Registered: 05/28/07
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 10:51 AM   in response to: Nathan P. Butler in response to: Nathan P. Butler
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Nathan P. Butler wrote:
(So that's why there's Even and Evan in pronunciation!

Thank you for noticing! I think the name pronunciation has bugged me more than the continuity. I think the solution should be Evan and Even are twins. Evan is dead and Even is in CN. :p


And thanks for the in depth response! And the same thanks to you Mr. Chee!

Nathan P. Butler


Posts: 4,653
Registered: 10/11/01
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 10:44 AM   in response to: SullustanExile in response to: SullustanExile
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
SullustanExile wrote:
I like your take on it Nathan. However, I am wondering how Wookieepedia can best interpret this issue. Piell's death in Coruscant Nights is no longer canon, yet Piell's actions in Coruscant Nights still need to be accounted for somehow, because the novels are still canon. As Wookieepedia only uses verifiable Star Wars facts, it can't speculate about Pavan's master in CN being a different Jedi, yet equally, it can't canonically claim that the Jedi in CN was Piell....

Edited by: SullustanExile on Mar 12, 2011 10:22 AM


Leland said:

This certainly affects a chunk of the continuity of the first Coruscant Nights book in which Even Piell's death was originally depicted. The rest of the continuity of that series will remain intact, though this does leave open the question of who was Jax Pavan's Master.

So, it just gets chalked up to being what is, for now, and unknown Jedi Master. There are plenty of unknown/unnamed characters listed on Wookieepedia. I see no problems, as long as the Wook sticks to its own precedents.
SullustanExile


Posts: 5
Registered: 02/22/08
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 10:14 AM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I like your take on it Nathan. However, I am wondering how Wookieepedia can best interpret this issue. Piell's death in Coruscant Nights is no longer canon, yet Piell's actions in Coruscant Nights still need to be accounted for somehow, because the novels are still canon. As Wookieepedia only uses verifiable Star Wars facts, it can't speculate about Pavan's master in CN being a different Jedi, yet equally, it can't canonically claim that the Jedi in CN was Piell....

Edited by: SullustanExile on Mar 12, 2011 10:22 AM
Nathan P. Butler


Posts: 4,653
Registered: 10/11/01
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 6:53 AM   in response to: Bri-Jay Waycay in response to: Bri-Jay Waycay
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I actually kind of like the fix, while at the same time rolling my eyes.

Why roll my eyes? Because it isn't as if any new reader of the novel will be reading and go "oh, well, that wasn't actually Even, so let me picture someone else."

But I like the fix because it is a simple solution to a "mini-nuke." There's no way to make it work with Even unless he ends up magically returning to life after being put into the lava-ish substance, or perhaps clone him. (So that's why there's Even and Evan in pronunciation! So that's why Reaves gave him two eyes! heh) In the absence of either of those, which, frankly, would totally undermine Lucas' intentions with the episode (and it's his call, so that would be a slippery slope with TCW to let the EU turn around and not retcon but undermine it).

So the only real solution is that it was a different Jedi, or that scene doesn't take place. Obviously, the latter can't happen because it would then negate the point of the first CN book.

I personally joke about the CN books frequently because I find it so utterly mind-boggling that Reaves couldn't keep the dates of the prequels and his own novels straight and managed to completely undermine the end of his own novel in doing so. Supposedly this was because he was writing with the idea that the series would be closer to ANH, though others have suggested that he has given an excuse that he was ill while writing. Either way, that series already has plenty of errors in it. That doesn't mean it needs to be "booted," though. For some, those might be their favorite novels, and who knows what might be built on the Jax Pavan foundation Reaves created?

Point being: If the solution to Jedi Alliance remaining in-continuity in light of Ziro the Hutt not being free between the TCW film and the episodes that portray his death is that we must assume that Jedi Alliance does not actually include Anakin, Obi-Wan, and Ahsoka (so we must have always chosen different characters, even when the game forces you into those characters' shoes), then this somewhat low key fix for Even Piell is at least a straightforward solution that follows a precedent from, among other things, Jedi Alliance.

Personally, I prefer precedent to completely unpredictable continuity rulings. That at least gives us a basis from which to speculate.

Notice that we also have a bit of explanation here too, which is unusual. We have a glimpse into when they found out about the episode in relation to Coruscant Nights, and the notion that they purposely minimized Piell's exposure as soon as they knew about Lucas' intentions with the episode. Unless one could negate Lucas' decision on the matter, how else could we have hoped for Leland and the EU folks to take action?

Edited by: Nathan P. Butler on Mar 12, 2011 9:53 AM
Master Optician


Posts: 21,021
Registered: 09/06/06
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 6:43 AM   in response to: Bri-Jay Waycay in response to: Bri-Jay Waycay
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
As for simply changing Even into a different character, that's just absurd.

No less absurd than the existing errors about him in the book. Like, a bright light hurting his "eyes". I consider him to be a minor character. Any change about him shouldn't be a big deal. We aren't dealing with Mace or Yoda or Chewbacca here. Yeah, I know existing continuity has been messed with again, but you know what? People need to come to terms that it's just gonna be messed with, no matter how much they complain. I've said this before. At least this time it was an insignificant character.
master_Lo


Posts: 810
Registered: 01/10/05
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 3:45 AM   in response to: Bri-Jay Waycay in response to: Bri-Jay Waycay
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I ask for Lucas and Co to stop with the pretense and come out and officially declare anything not worked on directly by Lucas to be completely non-canon. Just make everything Infinities, it would save everyone a lot of time, grief, and frustration and just make it easier to enjoy each piece of work as its own separate entity and not part of Star Wars lore.

Then the all the EU stories are pointless. It will kill it off. You have pretty radical approach to everything.
Darth_Trayus1


Posts: 2
Registered: 03/10/11
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 12, 2011 12:37 AM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Actually, don't do that. The whole reason I - and a LOT of others - enjoy the Star Wars Expanded Universe is because it's all part of the same story. It truly is modern myth, and if it were broken up into little independent stories, it will never have the same lasting, resonating purpose. Is it a headache sometimes? Sure, but it's a headache that I'm willing to put up with.

If the continuity were no longer meaningful, I would have no reason to continue indulging in it.
Bri-Jay Waycay


Posts: 742
Registered: 12/04/10
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 11, 2011 10:17 PM   in response to: CommanderCody243 in response to: CommanderCody243
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
CommanderCody243 wrote:
I like my idea more. Never liked those books anyways and in my mind the fourth will just be a waste of paper. Especially so many years after the first three came out and those three books had errors here there and everywhere. Scrap the whole story.

I agree with this, make it so Mr Chee.

As for simply changing Even into a different character, that's just absurd.

"Turns out that wasn't Even Piell, it was some other guy" is easy to do, but no less ridiculous. If that's what qualifies as an easy fix these days, continuity is non-existent.

I ask for Lucas and Co to stop with the pretense and come out and officially declare anything not worked on directly by Lucas to be completely non-canon. Just make everything Infinities, it would save everyone a lot of time, grief, and frustration and just make it easier to enjoy each piece of work as its own separate entity and not part of Star Wars lore.

Leland Y Chee


Posts: 1,450
Registered: 05/05/00
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 11, 2011 10:10 PM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
From the Episode Guide:

"The Expanded Universe of Star Wars novels originally had Even Piell survive the Clone Wars only to be killed while as a fugitive in the early days of the Empire. Piell's death in the Citadel Mission is the character's true fate."

This certainly affects a chunk of the continuity of the first Coruscant Nights book in which Even Piell's death was originally depicted. The rest of the continuity of that series will remain intact, though this does leave open the question of who was Jax Pavan's Master.

Piell has long been a sticking point because we never killed him off in the pre-Ep3 Clone Wars EU, and yet he was still missing from the Ep3 Jedi Council (he was in the Ep2 Jedi Council only because they reused Ep1 footage). We never fully explained who Anakin replaced when Palpatine appointed him to the Council and so we just went off the assumption that it was Piell who got the short shrift. So when we went looking for a prominent Jedi to kill off early on in Coruscant Nights, Even Piell fit the bill.

It wasn't until after the Coruscant Nights trilogy was completed that we learned that Even Piell's death would be rewritten with this episode. In the interim, we've tried to minimize that number of sources that mentioned Piell's fate.

Hopefully this answers some of the questions regarding this change in continuity.

  • Leland
http://twitter.com/HolocronKeeper
CommanderCody243

Posts: 58
Registered: 01/26/10
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 11, 2011 10:06 PM   in response to: Master Optician in response to: Master Optician
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I like my idea more. Never liked those books anyways and in my mind the fourth will just be a waste of paper. Especially so many years after the first three came out and those three books had errors here there and everywhere. Scrap the whole story.
Master Optician


Posts: 21,021
Registered: 09/06/06
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 11, 2011 10:04 PM   in response to: CommanderCody243 in response to: CommanderCody243
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
There's an easy fix here. Simply change the character in the book. Jedi Twilight has errors regarding Piell anyway. Just change it to another Jedi. Unless you are a die hard Piell fan (really?), this shouldn't be a big deal.
CommanderCody243

Posts: 58
Registered: 01/26/10
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 11, 2011 9:59 PM   in response to: Lord Vordek in response to: Lord Vordek
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
I have a suggestion.... just scrap the all three Coruscant Knight books and cancel the fourth.
Lord Vordek


Posts: 1
Registered: 07/27/07
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 11, 2011 8:04 PM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
So, Mr. Chee... Even Piell?
Yeah, that's gonna be a tough one...!
Cheers :)
Darth_Trayus1


Posts: 2
Registered: 03/10/11
Re: Holocron continuity database questions
Posted: Mar 10, 2011 6:23 PM   in response to: Leland Y Chee in response to: Leland Y Chee
    Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this post Reply
Hello Mr. Chee,
I had a question for you regarding Empire Day. Is this holiday celebrated by the Imperial Remnant and the Fel and Krayt Empires? Or even perhaps the Empire of the Hand and other mini-empires?

Many thanks!

Edited by: Darth_Trayus1 on Mar 10, 2011 6:24 PM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in all forums