Also note that all material, including G, C, and S, is "available" for continuity. That doesn't mean it wasn't continuity in the first place.
What is that supposed to mean? G and C are continuity. How can they be available for something they already are. That would make it redundant to call it available. Sorry, man, but this last one was rather weak.

Besides, where does this notion that anything with the Canon label is definetly a part of continuity come from in the first place? I mean, we've got N-canon to contradict that possibility right there.

You're not the only one on long searches . . . I finally found for to answer your question:

Okay, Non-continuity is not canon, it's just a way to classify non-continuity stuff in a database field called "canon."

Note that, in every case, including Tasty's original revelation on Page 2 and in , that S-canon is always referred to as canon, while N-level material is not. Thus, it's canon.

Also note that all material, including G, C, and S, is "available" for continuity. That doesn't mean it wasn't continuity in the first place.

I'd even go so far as to say Marvel can be disregarded entirely, because the only parts of them that are Canon owes that entirely to a C-canon reference, which can stand on its own two legs. I.e, the only Canon parts of it are those in the reference -the Marvel comic just happens to feature a storyline revolving around the same.

The last bit is speculation on my part, though. But considering how C-canon licensors are free to use or discard S-canon at their own leasure, I don't see how it can be any other way.

Even #78 has been dealt with. The Planet Hoppers: Hoth articles explained the "Janson dies" part of the story as a tall tale, and even the framing story was subtly dealt with in a throwaway line in the Planet Hoppers: Adumar article. So while the original intent isn't canon, the whole issue can now fit with everything else. I'm not sure that the original writer would appreciate having his gritty war story turned into a wacky Allstonesque prank, though.

The thing is that Marvel has been referenced with such frequency that nearly all of it has been mentioned in C-canon stories. So any way you look at it, most of (just about all) Marvel is C-canon. It's tough to think of a good example of a major Marvel storyline that hasn't been referenced and brought into canon.

TC

*1) I've misunderstood S-canon completely, and Han Solo featuring in a work of G-canon automatically makes every S-canon storyline, name and object centering on him C-canon.

2) S-canon is merely a non-canon, yet approved pool of ideas which licenced artists are free to draw upon for inspiration in their works, compared to N-canon, which they are prohibited from drawing upon in any way. For example, creators are free to canonize Crimson Jack from Marvel Star Wars 7 if they are so inclined, in which case the storyline about him from that comic never happened, whereas they cannot canonize Tag & Bink however much they want to.

Which is correct? And if neither, please explain. *

After long searches, I've found the answer to my own question. And it should hold some interest.
http://forums.starwars.com/thread.jspa?forumID=24 &hilite=true&start=15&threadID=74104&q=marvel#3629650

According to 4-Inches.de (http://www.4-inches.de/inhalt/hom e.htm), the Battle of Endor battlepack contains an Ewok known as Dochee. He's a black Ewok.

I was wondering where and if he can be seen in the movie or was he only created for Hasbro?

Unfortunately.

However, this new T-canon brings some promise. Perhaps it is a move by Leland to minimize contradictions somehow.

At this stage in time, Marvel should really be considered C canon, with the exception of the rare issue (eg., #78 and +Flight of the Falcon+) that's beyond retconning. A good majority of the series has been referenced in later sources. But even simply out of respect for the fact that these are the first stories, authors and illustrators of the EU, there should be no question of their place and status in the Star Wars saga.

I think S canon status should be reserved for the modern video games to allow the creators (who don't have the time to research the EU) to simply make fun games utilizing whatever scenarios, events or characters they want (with the exception being multimedia events like The Force Unleashed where time has been spent ensuring the continuity of the story.)

Are there any official explanations for vos being on kashyyyk in the clone wars vol 9 during ROTS? Ben says he his troops were moving and he was stationed on boz pity, I took this to mean his troops were going there and he followed them later because he had some unfinished business but has any official explanation been given?