Let's bombard th guy with more before he has had a chance to answer the last batch.

If I have understood things right, the Holocron contains information sorted by entries. These entries constitute Canon, not the individual source, regardless of the source's place in the Canon hierarchy.

Does this mean that if a C-canon source contains a little snippet of canon-contradictory information, this little snippet is simply disregarded from the entry detailing the topic in question?

For example: It has been established that lightsaber creation requires Force-sensitivity. Yet in KotOR, the technological genious Suvam Tan in orbit above Yavin 4 created a lightsaber without showing hint of sensitivity.

Would the Holocron's "Ligthsaber" or "Lightsaber creation" entry simply disregard this, and go with manistream C-canon?
In other words, is the Holocron a bit lax on contradictions?

nope nothing to do with indiana or illinios or anything, an unfortunate side effect of internet naming 'Evil Jedi' was taken a long time ago and I just stuck to using a few extra letters ever since.

Holy crap.

(Okay, uhm, mildly off-topic.)

"Eville_Jedi" . . . Does that happen to be referring to "Eville" as in "Evansville, Indiana?"

: gasp :

1. Who created the G,C,S,N canon hierarchy?

2. Since its initial creation, has the canonical hierarchy ever been updated to include new levels, or to change which parts fits in which category?

3. If the answer to question number 2 is yes, who authorised this change?

Thx Mr. Chee for pointing out these issues. It has once more proven the failure of many to blindly believe everything that is written on certain sites (like Red6).

Hi Tasty - sorry, another continuity question.

I'm a little confused about the differences between the two official Star Wars continuities of Films Only and Films + EU; since both continuities are bound by the films, surely they're almost exactly the same with the only difference between them being that one has no extra details outside of the films, and the other does? Since any additional details created in the Film Only universe (like the upcoming Star Wars TV series by George Lucas) automatically carry across into the Films + EU universe as G-canon, does that mean there will never be any actual deviation between the two? What exactly are the differences in each universe's storylines? And what goes in the blank timeline spaces of the Film Only universe - can we never know the history or background of that Star Wars universe like we can in the EU Star Wars universe?

Many thanks!

Is the Aleenan Senator Bogg Tyrell the widow of Ratts Tyerell and the mother of their three children Djulla, Doby and Deland? Or is there no connection between Bogg and Ratts and "Mrs. Tyerell" from the Episode I cut-scenes has not yet received a canonical name?

I don't want to butt in too much but here's one answer from http://starwars.com/qa :

Q. Are Sebulba, Ark "Bumpy" Roose, and Ratts Tyerell in the diner or the Coruscant chase scene in Episode II? In my Episode II Visual Dictionary, you can clearly see their faces.

A. Those aren't the Podracers you see in Episode II, though their computer-generated models were used as a basis for a handful of new characters. During the speeder chase, we see Obi-Wan nearly crash into an Aleena and a Dug. That's not Sebulba, but rather a Dug named Seboca. The Aleena is Bogg Tyrell (apparently no relation to Ratts since the surname is spelled differently). She is also seen in the diner, along with two Dugs named Rednax and Manoca, and a Nuknog named Slyther Bushforb. Outside the diner, there's an alien (it uses Podracer Ebe Endocott's body type) named Ony Bobbisia.

No official source has ever indicated that this guy is really Joanson. If it would be, I would certainly like to know what source that is. I'd be surprised about it.

http://i23.ebayimg.com /01/i/08/2d/6a/69_1_sbl.JPG

This is one of these fanon things that started on the infamous 'Red6' website and some other sites have copied that blindly without doing any further research. Even more sites have copied blindly what was copied blindly before, etc ...

Thanks for the previous reply, but next, I have another 3 questions. First of all, though the Jedi Exile is canonically female, is it at all possible that Brianna's adventures with her could still be canon? Although she only joins the party if you're male, I can't really see any conflict if that was only game mechanics and in fact both the Disciple and the Handmaiden joined the party.

Also, in the Tales 17 story, All for You, there is a Dark Jedi. Many fans have speculated that this is Darth Bane. Could you please either confirm or deny that either this is Bane or. if not, do they have a name?

And finally what, if anything, is your opinion on the solid-state hologram Maul from Phantom Menaces in Tales 17? You've said before that only the silly stories should definitely be non-canon, whereas some of the others (I believe) could be considered S-canon. While I don't find this story silly myself, some others do so I'm curious if it's canon, possibly canon, or completely non-canon?

Leland, is there some kind of entry on the background character played by Nathan Hamill in Episode I? I'm not even sure if he's actually visible, but he's been given the unofficial name "Rehtul Minnau" by Hamill. I'm sure it's completely unofficial. I'm just curious since the character appears HERE on the Wookieepedia.